So want to change SG?
Every year it seems like one party truly dominates the election of Senatorial Candidates. The last time that President for Senate was even a competitive election was after Swamp versus Ignite. Which was the last time, the Greek party openly split apart.
One of the problems is turnout, the partial voting reform that occurred is a very small step in the right direction. But if Greeks are concerned that they could forever lose power, why not ensure that you will always have some power. This is where the idea of proportional representation comes in.
I really don’t care if the Greeks are the majority or the “Independents”, one party rule helps no one, though. One party means the group breeds complacency, a monopoly of power helps nobody. It serves students best interest if a minority and different views are present. Innovation only comes out of competition, capitalism has shown us that. Damnit I am sounding like Jason Sherry.
In our system, spending 8000 dollars to get elected and end up with one seat seems like a joke. I mean, where does the little guy even have a chance in a situation like that.
Instead, let’s change how we run elections. Our system of elections is like no other, we don’t elect the best representative, we choose the best 1 or 2 up to 13 in some cases. Unfortunately, many, if not all, people just vote the party. The top vote getters get the seats in a multi Senate district/college. This gives 5 Senators to the winners and 0 for the losers, usually. Some colleges may split (Graduate Group and Engineering this year), but more people voted against the Gator Party in the Liberal Arts College this year, but the Gator Party still ended up with all 5 seats. Why? The vote was split between Progress and Impact. Do the 5 Gator Party members truly represent the Liberal Arts College? I would argue, they probably don’t. I will admit that a vote for Progress or Impact is not necessarily a vote against the Gator Party, or if Progress or Impact were not in the race that they the other would have won. But there are definitely more non Gator Party votes than for.
My idea is proportional representation of each college and district. This would still allow the party majority party to claim the majority of seats in the college, but would also allow for the minority party to have their views shown as would be more realistic with this type of election.
In spring, Our Senate ended up like this:
Senators Gator Party 38
Impact Party 6
Progress Party 1Voice Party 1 For those interested in how I am going to come up the following numbers, I averaged the number of votes that the members of the party received in that college, added up all the averages, and came up with percentages, and applied those percentages to the number of seats available. I know math and stats majors are probably cringing, but go with me for a sec. I also discounted any “independent” candidates for the time being.
Below you will see the new totals, the only district that did not
work well was the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, where Progress and Impact each received 1 seat, Gator received 2 seats, Voice did not have enough to merit a seat. Since the Gator Party, had the most votes, they received 3 seats.
New Senator Totals Number Added/Subtracted
Gator Party 29 -9 Impact Party 10 +4Progress Party 5 +4Voice Party 2 +1The Gator Party still retains a commanding control of the Senate. Now, though they would have to be more conscious of the other parties, unlike now. This in my opinion would create a more reflective Senate. A Senate that actually mirrors the results would go a long way to smoothing over relations with the Student Body. Yes, the "Greek Party" could still win all 46 seats, but too often it seems that our Fall Elections are merely people jockeying for position for the Spring Elections. The Fall Elections usually don't have nearly as much money or turnout, but this would give the non-Greek backed party a reason to try and win. Sure they wouldn't win the single member districts too often, but they would win some seats in those large districts. This also allows for more people to get involved.
I will admit there are cons to such an idea:
First, we would forever kill the truly independent senator. No longer would a Paden Woodruff of Tolbert Area, Justin Lutin of engineering fame last year, the law school guy last year, and all the others be elected. Not slated, you are not running. It would kill individuality in these elections. No longer would you be able to vote for your friend in Party A and 2 other people in Party B .
It would also guarantee probably lower turnouts of volunteers. Why? In a sophomore race, there are 6 candidates. The top one will almost assuredly get a spot, the next two might get spots, the bottom 3 probably won’t unless there is little to no competition. If you don’t have a good chance of being elected, you might not campaign as hard or at all.
There are more cons to this, I am sure and please feel free to point any and ALL of them out. I just want to know why this is not viable here at UF. Because it isn’t American, neither are plurality votes where we vote for 13 people for one thing.
Thanks for reading.